Podcast in English
Text size
Bulgarian National Radio © 2024 All Rights Reserved

Dialogue and expectations – the gulf between politicians and voters

Photo: BGNES

The process of registration of parties and coalitions at the Central Electoral Commission for the parliamentary elections on 4 April is into its second day. However, sociologists are not predicting any drastic change of the status quo prevalent since 2009. Analyses seem to boil down to possible party coalitions in the future parliament which 7 political formations standing a chance of entering parliament, indicates a sociological survey by Sova Harris.

“These elections are fundamentally unpredictable because it is impossible to predict the most important parameter – how many people are going to come out and vote. If less than 2 million people vote this would result in a random, distorted picture which would not correspond to the attitudes of Bulgarians, would make things very unstable and would very quickly lead to change. Because a government is stable if it matches the attitudes of the voters,” sociologist Andrey Raychev says in an interview for the BNR.


According to the Sova Harris survey, commissioned by Trud newspaper, at this time 14% of Bulgarians say they are not going to vote, and 22.4% are undecided who to vote for.

Electoral attitudes are still unclear. At this time, firm support is being demonstrated by the “fan clubs” of the major players – GERB and the Bulgarian Socialist Party, indicates a vox pop by Iva Antonova, BNR’s correspondent in Vratsa, Northwestern Bulgaria. Vratsa region is heading towards the elections with a new look, but with chronic problems, Iva Antonova says. Infrastructure projects, investments, jobs and targeted policies in education and healthcare have boosted the region’s development. But some rural municipalities and smaller towns and villages have seen nothing of this progress and life there continues to depend heavily on how big pensions are. One of the likely explanations of the imbalance is the party contrast between central and local authorities.


“Things happen when the mayors of the given town or village are from the ruling party, and when a government is working for the people it should not funnel money into the places where it has mayors and nowhere else. In a democratic country that is not something that should be happening. Come to the small towns and villages and see for yourselves, there is a huge difference,” one woman told Iva Antonova.

The political configurations in recent years have instilled a sense of despair in many Bulgarians: it doesn’t matter who takes the helm, things are not going to be any different. People rarely tend to express any concrete expectations of their future political representatives, and often say they will vote for the person who makes them a better offer, whatever they mean by that. The politicians on their part have not yet presented concrete political programmes and have been debating mostly party lists and coalitions:


“This inability of ours to give politicians reference points, to be their compass have reduced the country to a condition in which politicians put on a show for show’s sake, to parties trying to outtalk one another, and they are talking to their own selves, they are not talking with us,” says political analyst Lyubomir Stefanov for the BNR’s Horizont channel. “Politicians are unable to construct a dialogue with the voters that would be permanent, not cyclic – from one election to the next.”

In his words there is no political formation at the moment that could be seen emphatically as an ongoing agent of the protest energy and the determination seen during the protests in the summer months. “The campaigning is yet to be filled with messages, we are yet to hear any concrete substance.”


Party ideas and platforms have been growing increasingly irrelevant when it comes to who is going to win the elections, Daniel Stefanov, election expert says and goes on to lay emphasis on the fact that parties in Bulgaria “derive power from personal conflicts in society and drag them centre stage”. Even before the start of the election campaigning polarization is soaring, and “sharp collisions mean less substance”, the analyst says.

Interviews by Petar Volgin, Veselina Milanova and Iva Antonova, Horizont channel

Editing by Elena Karkalanova

Translated from the Bulgarian by Milena Daynova

Photos: Ani Petrove-BNR, archive-BNR and BGNES


Последвайте ни и в Google News Showcase, за да научите най-важното от деня!
Listen to the daily news from Bulgaria presented in "Bulgaria Today" podcast, available in Spotify.

More from category

Rumen Radev

President continues consultations on new cabinet

As required by the Constitution, President Rumen Radev is holding consultations with representatives of the parliamentary groups in the 50th National Assembly before handing over the first exploratory mandate for the formation of a new Cabinet. After..

published on 6/25/24 7:15 AM
Ekrem İmamoğlu

Balkan developments

Mayor of Istanbul criticizes the migrant agreement between Turkey and the EU The mayor of Istanbul and an opponent of President Erdogan, Ekrem İmamoğlu, sharply criticized the 2016 agreement between Turkey and the EU to..

published on 6/21/24 1:06 PM

Nikolay Denkov, PP-DB: Techocracies are a fig leaf

Former Prime Minister Nikolay Denkov of the PP-DB has confirmed that the coalition will not support a cabinet with first and second mandates, and is against the idea of an ITN for a government led by technocrats with a third mandate.   "Technocracy,..

published on 6/20/24 4:34 PM